Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: meino.cramer@×××.de
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Still trying to compile hydrogen
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 15:19:01
Message-Id: 20120218151637.GD3062@solfire
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Still trying to compile hydrogen by Alan McKinnon
1 Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> [12-02-18 16:00]:
2 > On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 15:37:24 +0100
3 > Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org> wrote:
4 >
5 > > meino.cramer@×××.de writes:
6 > >
7 > > > As this line in my previous posting states, museseq needs Qt 4.*,
8 > > > which is installed...:
9 > > >
10 > > > configure: error: need qt >= 3.2.0
11 > >
12 > > Um, huh? If it would need Qt 4.*, it would say that you need qt >=
13 > > 4.something. But it says you need qt >= 3.2.0, so qt-meta 3.3.8b-r2
14 > > (which I have installed) would do fine.
15 > > Oh, I just see that this is no longer in portage, my qt-meta:3 comes
16 > > from the kde-sunset overlay.
17 > >
18 > > Maybe having Qt4 installed with the qt3support USE flag would work,
19 > > but I doubt it. Qt4 is very different from Qt3.
20 >
21 > my understanding is that qt3support gives run-time support only
22 > for apps built against qt3 but running under qt4 (i.e it's just a
23 > simple run-time wrapper around API calls).
24 >
25 > But qt3support cannot be used to built against qt4
26 >
27 > --
28 > Alan McKinnnon
29 > alan.mckinnon@×××××.com
30 >
31 >
32
33 So, if QT3 is removed from protage, and museseq which still is in
34 portage seems only to build agains qt3, I see a contradiction here...
35
36 May be on my system there somewhere leftovers from ancient time,
37 when qt3 needs some additional environment variables or such (?)...
38 what would it be...where I can I look for such settings?
39
40 best regards,
41 mcc

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Still trying to compile hydrogen Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Still trying to compile hydrogen Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org>