From: | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Changing boot device with 2.6.36 | ||
Date: | Tue, 04 Jan 2011 21:42:17 | ||
Message-Id: | 201101042341.17612.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Changing boot device with 2.6.36 by Stroller |
1 | Apparently, though unproven, at 15:18 on Tuesday 04 January 2011, Stroller did |
2 | opine thusly: |
3 | |
4 | > On 4/1/2011, at 9:42am, Jörg Schaible wrote: |
5 | > >> ... |
6 | > >> Does |
7 | > >> |
8 | > >> boot=LABEL=<boot_device_label> |
9 | > >> |
10 | > >> in grub config work for you? |
11 | > > |
12 | > > I hoped so, but actually no. Grub complains at boot time not finding the |
13 | > > root device. Is this available in the grub-0.97 series at all? |
14 | > |
15 | > I found numerous references to this syntax going back to 2005 or |
16 | > so, and some major distros seem to use it as the default way of |
17 | > describing "root=" to the kernel. |
18 | > |
19 | > http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/redhat-fedora-linux-help/23010-root-label- |
20 | > grub-conf.html |
21 | > http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/RedHat/2005-01/0026.html |
22 | > |
23 | > However: |
24 | > http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-Using--%22root%3DLABEL%3Dxxxx%22-in-grub.conf-p |
25 | > 21909347.html http://tinyurl.com/2u4srg4 |
26 | > |
27 | > Stroller. |
28 | |
29 | |
30 | All the major distros I've seen it on also use initrds though (rare in gentoo- |
31 | land). I have no idea how it all works, I just know how to type it on a RHEL |
32 | box. |
33 | |
34 | Elsewhere in the thread someone mentioned that this syntax relies on an |
35 | initrd, and I suspect he may be correct. |
36 | |
37 | |
38 | -- |
39 | alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Changing boot device with 2.6.36 | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> |