1 |
James wrote: |
2 |
> Hello |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
> So, I've been wanting to test eudev for a while now. I found these |
6 |
> instructions in many places, so I have it a whirl: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> # emerge -Ca udev |
9 |
> # emerge -1a eudev |
10 |
> # etc-update |
11 |
> # emerge @preserved-rebuild |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Problem is I had the 'udev' flag set in the make.conf, so it just |
14 |
> reinstalled udev (216). so I figured I'd better ask about the |
15 |
> convsion of udev-216 to eudev-1.10-r2 (stable) or if I should |
16 |
> run eudev-2.1.1 ? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Beside also removing the 'udev' flag, do I have any other issues |
19 |
> or caveats? I'd like to also go with manually naming the ethernet |
20 |
> interfaces under eudev; I have not found any specific docs on that |
21 |
> either. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Discussion and Suggestions are most welcome. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> James |
27 |
> |
28 |
> |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
I switched a good while back so this may be a bit fuzzy. I'm running |
32 |
eudev-2.1.1 here with no issues. I don't have anything in my USE flag |
33 |
about udev and everything I plug in is managed just fine. I'm pretty |
34 |
sure your commands above is all I used as well. I don't recall running |
35 |
anything outside the norm. |
36 |
|
37 |
Basically, after you switch, the OS doesn't see anything different. On |
38 |
mine here, even the init scripts have the same name. I was sort of |
39 |
expecting them to change from udev to eudev but it didn't. |
40 |
|
41 |
If something is pulling udev back in, may want to add the -t option to |
42 |
emerge and see what is pulling it in. |
43 |
|
44 |
Hope that helps. |
45 |
|
46 |
Dale |
47 |
|
48 |
:-) :-) |