1 |
Neil Bothwick <neil <at> digimed.co.uk> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
> The question was about desktop usage, it was about moving from KDE to |
5 |
> LXDE. How things work in a completely different environment is |
6 |
> irrelevant, the rules are different. |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
To Neil and Alan: These examples are trite and are simply and quickly |
10 |
offered up as examples on each others perspectives, irrespecitve of minutia. |
11 |
Old dogs snarl quite a bit, but do not move off of their haunches, unless |
12 |
sufficiently motivated. Its more fundamental simpler than that. You do not |
13 |
change another man's underware (metaphysically speaking here). You offer up |
14 |
new, exciting offerings, at his convenience or time of choosing and hope he |
15 |
likes what you are offering. That's the sort of analogy, thats most |
16 |
accurate, imho. |
17 |
|
18 |
WE can all "wax poetic" about do's and don't of trite examples: the point is |
19 |
it's not KDE place to change *MY* anything, unless I want it by taking |
20 |
specific action or they use a proper roll out semantic. KDE lost site of |
21 |
that, and many astute folks have left for greener pastures. QT/Nokia going |
22 |
over to the "dark side" (aka MicroSoft) has not helped KDE either. |
23 |
|
24 |
WE're all three right, each from our perspectives. (can I get a hug?) I'm |
25 |
quite certain that the 3 of us, have deep experience with "five nines" and |
26 |
such. KDE has become a joke, imho. You want my repect, show me something, |
27 |
with math, HA, redundancy, or 99999+ type of performance. Most of the rest |
28 |
quacks and woddles, so do not argue with me for shooting at the (KDE) ducks..... |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
peace and good hunting, |
32 |
James |