| 1 |
Daniel D Jones wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 01 February 2009 17:49:03 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:07:37 +0000, Daniel D Jones wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> 3.5.10 is available under the meta package system but not under the KDE |
| 7 |
>>> package. Do I have to switch to the meta package to go to 3.5.10? |
| 8 |
>>> (Without, that is, manually unblocking lots and lots of packages.) Can |
| 9 |
>>> I simply install the meta package over the base package or will that |
| 10 |
>>> create blocks or other issues? |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>> The monolithic and split ebuilds are incompatible, so you'll have to |
| 13 |
>> uninstall one before you can install the other. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> emerge -C kde |
| 16 |
>> emerge --depclean -a |
| 17 |
>> emerge -av kde-meta |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> That's what I was afraid of. Sigh. Thanks. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Could he just emerge -C kde then re-emerge whatever he wanted without |
| 26 |
having to reinstall all of KDE? Isn't packages like Konqueror just a |
| 27 |
dependency pulled in by the original emerge kde? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Maybe I am missing something but I would hate to have to recompile all |
| 30 |
of KDE just for that upgrade. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Dale |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
:-) :-) |
Archives