| 1 |
Thank you for the feedback.. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> From: Ron Bickers <rbickers-list-gentoo-user@××××××××.com> |
| 5 |
> Date: 2005/09/22 Thu PM 02:26:23 EDT |
| 6 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| 7 |
> CC: brettholcomb@×××××××××.net |
| 8 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] SATA and RAID |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> On Thu September 22 2005 07:22 am, brettholcomb@×××××××××.net wrote: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> > For RAID I'm running RAID10 on an existing SCSI system - two RAID1 |
| 13 |
> > combined to a RAID0 but I'm open to better things. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I don't have any experience with RAID10, but I've read good things about it. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> > Filesystem of choice is XFS but what did you find? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> In my primitive tests, XFS showed good performance for really large files -- |
| 20 |
> like raw video files in the gigabytes (as it was designed to do), but small |
| 21 |
> and "normal" file size performance is what I needed more and it wasn't |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives