Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev-191 bit me. Insufficient ptys
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:05:27
Message-Id: CA+czFiDkUV+R9W66D6_MQp6=mYGmeWQ8BoTNE71c4PTLqX5W7g@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] udev-191 bit me. Insufficient ptys by Michael Mol
1 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote:
3 >> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> wrote:
5 >>>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote:
6 >>>>> So, I botched the upgrade to udev-191. I thought I'd followed the
7 >>>>> steps, but I apparently only covered them for one machine, not both.
8 >>>>>
9 >>>>> The news item instructions specified that I had to remove
10 >>>>> udev-postmount from my runlevels. I didn't have udev-postmount in my
11 >>>>> runlevels, so I didn't remove it. Turns out, that dictum also applies
12 >>>>> to udev-mount. So after removing that[1], I was able to at least boot
13 >>>>> again.
14 >>>>>
15 >>>>> Udev also complained about DEVTMPFS not being enabled in the
16 >>>>> kernel.[2] I couldn't get into X, but I could log in via getty and a
17 >>>>> plain old vt, so I enabled it, rebuilt the kernel, installed it and
18 >>>>> rebooted...and now that's presumably covered.
19 >>>>>
20 >>>>> I'm now able to get into X, but when I try to run an xterm, it fails.
21 >>>>> Checking ~/.xsession_errors, I find:
22 >>>>>
23 >>>>> xterm: Error 32, error 2: No such file or directory
24 >>>>> Reason: get_pty: not enough ptys
25 >>>>
26 >>>> Do you have CONFIG_LEGACY_PTYS=y? If so, do you really need it? A
27 >>>> little over a year ago[1] I had an annoying issue for having that
28 >>>> option enabled in my kernel, with a lot of virtual ttys reported in
29 >>>> systemctl. This is a shot in the dark (I really don't know if it's
30 >>>> related to your problem), but perhaps having the LEGACY_PTYS option
31 >>>> enabled somehow depleted your available pseudo terminals (which any X
32 >>>> terminal needs to run)? I suppose screen is also out of the question
33 >>>> for the same reason.
34 >>
35 >> No, I don't have CONFIG_LEGACY_PTYs. I do have UNIX98 PTYs, and I
36 >> tried enabling alternate namespaces, but that didn't help either.
37 >>
38 >>>
39 >>> Also related, if you have LEGACY_PTYS:
40 >>>
41 >>> "LEGACY_PTY_COUNT:
42 >>>
43 >>> The maximum number of legacy PTYs that can be used at any one time.
44 >>> The default is 256, and should be more than enough. Embedded
45 >>> systems may want to reduce this to save memory.
46 >>>
47 >>> When not in use, each legacy PTY occupies 12 bytes on 32-bit
48 >>> architectures and 24 bytes on 64-bit architectures."
49 >>
50 >> Yeah, I'm not using CONFIG_LEGACY_PTY, so LEGACY_PTY_COUNT doesn't
51 >> even make itself available in menuconfig.
52 >
53 > Hm. Some googling suggests this might be a permissions issue.
54 >
55 > I do have consolekit enabled, but I'm using gdm, so I'd expect that to
56 > take care of itself. (Although screen fails to launch from vt1, so
57 > it's not a consolekit problem.)
58
59 OK, it looks like /dev/pts is not mounted. But darned if I know
60 why...Isn't udev supposed to handle that?
61
62 --
63 :wq

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] udev-191 bit me. Insufficient ptys Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org>
Re: [gentoo-user] udev-191 bit me. Insufficient ptys Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>