1 |
On 27/5/20 3:26 am, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 26 May 2020 20:13:29 +0100, antlists wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>> Mounting the card with sync will significantly reduce the likelihood |
5 |
>>> of corruption, at a cost of reduced life. |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>> Well, compared to a dead card, a reduced life is a small price to pay |
8 |
>> :-) |
9 |
> A dead card is a reduced life ;-) |
10 |
> |
11 |
>> I think you're talking about a corrupted filesystem, I'm talking about |
12 |
>> a corrupt/dead card ... |
13 |
> I am. I still think the idea of a soft power button is the least complex |
14 |
> and most reliable approach. |
15 |
> |
16 |
I'll add a "me too" - soft power off rules. Look into a pi-juice Hat or |
17 |
similar - it has a battery and can turn off properly either at low |
18 |
battery, or when power is removed. Alternatively, a pi is very low |
19 |
power anyway ... why not just leave it on in a featureless "black box" |
20 |
with no lights showing and program the remote to to do a fake |
21 |
"standbay/off" that triggers a script to blank the video and or reset |
22 |
the screen to the entry menu? (if you are like me, playing with the gear |
23 |
is way more fun than using it as a media box! :) |
24 |
|
25 |
I have a few different pi's and similar Odroid arm systems running |
26 |
Gentoo on sdcards - the failure rate is a real and constant problem (and |
27 |
seems worse on pi's no matter what brand/type of sdcard so keep an up to |
28 |
date spare+backups) and I am thinking of doing a disk-less NFS using the |
29 |
a minimal sdcard image. Has advantages in centralised management and |
30 |
using small cheap sdcards with possibly better performance. |
31 |
|
32 |
BillK |