Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 03:51:07
Message-Id: 52E9CC1F.6080900@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably by Alan McKinnon
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 01/27/2014 02:06 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
5 > On 27/01/2014 13:59, Tanstaafl wrote:
6 >> On 2014-01-26 1:04 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
7 >>> So, not sure where your optimism comes from. But... some devs
8 >>> are interested in starting from scratch or picking up pkgcore
9 >>> (which would be the most sane thing to do IMO).
10 >>
11 >> ?
12 >>
13 >> If the problem is really this potentially serious, why start
14 >> from scratch, when Paludis is already very mature? Is it pure
15 >> politics (someone just doesn't like Ciaran)?
16 >>
17 >>
18 >>
19 >
20 >
21 > No-one likes to admit it, but I think there's some NIH going on
22 >
23
24 I just tried paludis again (after some time).
25
26 Things that make it currently impossible to properly migrate my
27 portage config:
28 * you cannot unmask USE flags at all, not without hackery... and that
29 is really non-trivial for unmasking abi_x86_32 globally, because those
30 masks are scattered across a lot of files in profiles/
31 The explanation from the paludis developer is simply wrong:
32 http://paludis.exherbo.org/trac/ticket/817
33 * seems there is no equivalent to --dynamic-deps=y (which is default
34 in emerge)... either I am missing something or this is a pretty good
35 reason to not use it
36 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
37 Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
38 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
39
40 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS6cwfAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWz+MoIAJvH9zDbsVQaRwyb+yMEowJ8
41 qXjaLmDTx5BFyyL7tSelFEYyNwh0DN1ypyOQu2VkScNOTNIbqfffWXsAPoe4GJrP
42 pngtb9xo4H4/IIdtr7i8fwRU937UK5V4Fq0Er/e56SGpdHG3G+emxrBeuB2Y6n0M
43 m+gdEI1xmSuB/YOd/byDc+t9qK1688qM23fHJd/SsW732FY9ooUlfSZuO39ltjpk
44 96ojLyGe4TAp5zkk2BNBbpLXyuAtszwsc8U5nPN89v87gbC7gH5pIrJDXbQkRfMF
45 EP0ouZ6nfB4cDqFM1/GVvJ2+V24jleWkpV3UQmCPDAd18T6Qa/fkujz0JuijXAg=
46 =FfQN
47 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage performance dropped considerably Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk>