| 1 |
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 2013-08-12 8:06 AM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> True, it won't be dropped for long as people are maintaining it. That's |
| 6 |
>> how maintainership works. |
| 7 |
>> But trying to lie to people it's somehow solving something currently is |
| 8 |
>> annoying as 'ell and should be corrected where seen. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> It is solving the problem of *when* (not if - if the words I have read from the systemd maintainers can be taken at face value) the systemd maintainers decide to pull the plug on the ability to have a systemd-less udev... |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Correct. And because that we endorse it. |
| 15 |
Look what happened with the logind. |
Archives