| 1 |
On Thursday 30 June 2011 14:30:09 András Csányi did opine thusly: |
| 2 |
> Hi All, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I like KDE and I use it on daily basis. I would like to change the |
| 5 |
> style of the windows but if the eye candy stuffs are disabled only |
| 6 |
> the original theme is working properly. What does it mean "working |
| 7 |
> properly"? In this case means that the parts of the windows are |
| 8 |
> well drawn according to design. Design of the window buttons on the |
| 9 |
> upper-right corner are drawn properly, not hided, they are not |
| 10 |
> blinking, etc. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> The cause is simple why I turned off the eye candy stuffs, they are |
| 13 |
> hungry and eating my CPU. This is a little bit strange for me |
| 14 |
> because I have a reasonable nVidia video card with 512Mbyte RAM and |
| 15 |
> my system is well configured. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> My question is that, it is normal when the eye candy stuffs are |
| 18 |
> disabled only the original style is working properly? Should I give |
| 19 |
> you screenshots about the not proper working to clarify what is my |
| 20 |
> problem? Should I report this as bug in bugs.gentoo.org? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
a clear description of the problem is absolutely vital. Here's how |
| 23 |
your question goes: |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Q: KDE candy is broken |
| 27 |
A: No it's not |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
You are going to have to put in the effor to be clear about what you |
| 30 |
are saying, use the correct names for things (eg the theme name, not |
| 31 |
"the original " - that's means very little) and probably screenshots |
| 32 |
too if the query is about corrupted visuals. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
I suspect your setup is wrong. I have switched all my fancy effects |
| 35 |
off and all shipped 4.6 themese work here. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives