| 1 |
On 12/08/2013 12:21, Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2013-08-11 1:48 PM, Marc Joliet <marcec@×××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Am Sun, 11 Aug 2013 13:30:57 -0400 |
| 4 |
>> schrieb Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org>: |
| 5 |
>>> I just tried changing it |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> eselect profile set 3 |
| 8 |
>>> eselect profile set 1 |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> and it didn't create the link in /etc/portage, it is still in /etc... |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>> Ah, then it *preserves* the current location. I have it in |
| 13 |
>> /etc/portage and |
| 14 |
>> eselect profile kept it there, too. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> However, I just checked and if you delete make.profile and then |
| 17 |
>> re-create it |
| 18 |
>> with eselect profile it is created in /etc/portage. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
>>> So, to do this manually just: |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>>> ~ ln -s make.profile /usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/amd64/13.0 |
| 23 |
>>> |
| 24 |
>>> ~ rm /etc/make.profile |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
>> I guess so. Or "rm /etc/make.profile && eselect profile set |
| 27 |
>> <whatever>" as |
| 28 |
>> described above. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Ok, thanks all, makes sense now... |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Please read the man page for ln. |
| 35 |
You have the arguments in reverse. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 41 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives