1 |
On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 13:29:14 BST Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Mick wrote: |
3 |
> > On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 12:02:48 BST Dale wrote: |
4 |
> >> Mick wrote: |
5 |
> >>> On Tuesday, 25 September 2018 03:11:38 BST Walter Dnes wrote: |
6 |
> >>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 02:59:17PM +0100, Mick wrote |
7 |
> >>>> |
8 |
> >>>>> This is worse than I expected. OK, therefore never signing into |
9 |
> >>>>> Google's |
10 |
> >>>>> systems with Chromium is the only way to stop this invasion of |
11 |
> >>>>> privacy. |
12 |
> >>>>> Thankfully, we still have Firefox. ;-) |
13 |
> >>>> |
14 |
> >>>> Ahemm... |
15 |
> >>>> https://dustri.org/b/mozilla-is-still-screwing-around-with-privacy-in-f |
16 |
> >>>> ir |
17 |
> >>>> ef |
18 |
> >>>> ox.html |
19 |
> >>> |
20 |
> >>> Yes, there is this leaking agent running in FF, but I have (almost) |
21 |
> >>> disabled telemetry. The problem is this pesky entry which is shown as |
22 |
> >>> "locked" and therefore unable to be disabled in about:config |
23 |
> >>> |
24 |
> >>> Preference Name Status Type Value |
25 |
> >>> ========================= ====== ======= ===== |
26 |
> >>> toolkit.telemetry.enabled locked boolean true |
27 |
> >> |
28 |
> >> Just for giggles, I looked at my config and it shows a default status |
29 |
> >> and is set to false. Maybe it is a difference in version or could it be |
30 |
> >> a USE flag makes a difference or something else??? I'm on Firefox |
31 |
> >> 52.9.0. Maybe you are using the latest version. I'm stuck here due to |
32 |
> >> some add ons not ready for the newer versions. |
33 |
> >> |
34 |
> >> Dale |
35 |
> >> |
36 |
> >> :-) :-) |
37 |
> > |
38 |
> > I'm on 60.2.0 and although other telemetry entries are modifiable, the one |
39 |
> > I mention above is shown as locked. Apparently this is locked to 'true' |
40 |
> > for pre-release builds and 'false' for release builds: |
41 |
> > |
42 |
> > https://medium.com/georg-fritzsche/data-preference-changes-in-firefox-58-2 |
43 |
> > d5df9c428b5 |
44 |
> Ahhh. I was hoping that info might lead to a solution to it but I guess |
45 |
> not. Better to mention and it not matter than to not mention and it |
46 |
> would have helped. lol Heck, I get help from this list but I also try |
47 |
> to help when I can. All we can do is try. |
48 |
> |
49 |
> We tried. ;-) |
50 |
> |
51 |
> Dale |
52 |
> |
53 |
> :-) :-) |
54 |
|
55 |
Yes, this one is hardcoded and there doesn't seem to be a workaround, other |
56 |
than modifying the source code. |
57 |
-- |
58 |
Regards, |
59 |
Mick |