1 |
On 29/08/2014 15:28, Joseph wrote: |
2 |
> Thank you for the input. |
3 |
> I've decided to try SSD: |
4 |
> Crucial MX100 512GB SATA 6Gb/s 2.5 |
5 |
> |
6 |
> It seem to have a good review |
7 |
> I have a Poly-ITX 945GC3 an ATOM-330 how to check if this disk will be |
8 |
> compatible with this motherboard? |
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
I have to ask: how much exactly do you really know about computers? |
14 |
Because most of your questions lead me to believe not very much, and you |
15 |
ask folks here to do your thinking for you. |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
Now go onto TheGoogle(tm), find the data sheet for your motherboard and |
19 |
see if it supports SATA running at that speed. |
20 |
|
21 |
Why should we do your google searches for you mean you can just as |
22 |
easily do them yourself? |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
> |
28 |
> The unit run asterik, hylafax and VM (VirtualBox) 7/24 |
29 |
> |
30 |
> -- |
31 |
> Joseph |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |
34 |
> On 08/29/14 08:58, J. Roeleveld wrote: |
35 |
>> On Thursday, August 28, 2014 10:54:25 PM Joseph wrote: |
36 |
>>> No, I wouldn't get 1TB SSD too expensive but something like 300GB I |
37 |
>>> might |
38 |
>>> consider it. Are they worth the investment? What brand do you have |
39 |
>>> and how |
40 |
>>> long? |
41 |
>> |
42 |
>> Please do NOT top-post. |
43 |
>> |
44 |
>> |
45 |
>> Currently, from what I found out, good brands are: |
46 |
>> Intel, Samsung and Crucial. |
47 |
>> |
48 |
>> Do check on how they perform though, for my usage (Extensive use of |
49 |
>> VMs), the |
50 |
>> Samsung EVOs were not suitable as the performance can drop with large |
51 |
>> writes. |
52 |
>> (doesn't help when taking a full snapshot, eg. with memory-dump, of a |
53 |
>> VM with |
54 |
>> a lot of memory) |
55 |
>> |
56 |
>> But for most people, the EVOs are good. |
57 |
>> The Samsung Pro does not have this, but costs more. |
58 |
>> |
59 |
>> The Crucial has, according to some reviews, a cleaner shutdown where any |
60 |
>> outstanding writes during shutdown are actually committed to disk. I |
61 |
>> am not |
62 |
>> convinced I will ever notice it either way though. |
63 |
>> |
64 |
>> Intel has good reviews and good performance. |
65 |
>> |
66 |
>> For any model you are considering, check the reviews online as the |
67 |
>> technology |
68 |
>> behind SSDs is still changing and the firmware and chips keep changing as |
69 |
>> well. A good brand now, might be a bad one tomorrow. |
70 |
>> |
71 |
>> For reference, I use the following in my laptop: |
72 |
>> |
73 |
>> # smartctl -a /dev/sda | grep "Device Model" |
74 |
>> Device Model: INTEL SSDMCEAC120B3 |
75 |
>> # smartctl -a /dev/sdb | grep "Device Model" |
76 |
>> Device Model: Crucial_CT1024M550SSD1 |
77 |
>> |
78 |
>> -- |
79 |
>> Joost |
80 |
>> |
81 |
>>> -- |
82 |
>>> Joseph |
83 |
>>> |
84 |
>>> On 08/29/14 06:11, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
85 |
>>> >On 29/08/2014 00:56, Joseph wrote: |
86 |
>>> >> So there seems to be a pattern :-/ |
87 |
>>> >> How about SSD they are not that much more? Will it withstand Gentoo |
88 |
>>> >> compilations :-) ? |
89 |
>>> > |
90 |
>>> >No. There is not a pattern. Two guys used drives for 5 years and then |
91 |
>>> >they failed. |
92 |
>>> > |
93 |
>>> >5 years? Wow. That's double what you can reasonably expect, you got |
94 |
>>> good |
95 |
>>> >service. |
96 |
>>> > |
97 |
>>> >SSDs are much more expensive than spinning disks, 1TB will cost a |
98 |
>>> >fortune. But they work in Gentoo very well - I'm on my second and this |
99 |
>>> >one is 256G, still runs as fast as the day I got it. |
100 |
>>> > |
101 |
>>> >> -- |
102 |
>>> >> Joseph |
103 |
>>> >> |
104 |
>>> >> On 08/28/14 22:46, Mick wrote: |
105 |
>>> >>> On Thursday 28 Aug 2014 21:45:10 Joseph wrote: |
106 |
>>> >>>> I need to select 500GB or 1TB infernal 2.5in drive, any |
107 |
>>> recommendation |
108 |
>>> >>>> (reliability) of the brand. My current WD 320GB fail after 5-years. |
109 |
>>> >>> |
110 |
>>> >>> Interesting ... mine also failed catastrophically a couple of months |
111 |
>>> >>> ago after |
112 |
>>> >>> around 5 years of continuous use. |
113 |
>>> >>> |
114 |
>>> >>> Which reminds me to run a backup on my Seagate: |
115 |
>>> >>> |
116 |
>>> >>> Model Family: Seagate Momentus 7200.4 |
117 |
>>> >>> Device Model: ST9500420ASG |
118 |
>>> >>> |
119 |
>>> >>> I'm not sure how much anecdotal reports on reliable drives |
120 |
>>> actually hold |
121 |
>>> >>> water, unless we're talking about an epidemic of failures like I |
122 |
>>> seem to |
123 |
>>> >>> recall Dell's Seagate drives experienced a few years ago. |
124 |
>>> >>> |
125 |
>>> >>> -- |
126 |
>>> >>> Regards, |
127 |
>>> >>> Mick |
128 |
> |
129 |
> |
130 |
> |
131 |
|
132 |
|
133 |
-- |
134 |
Alan McKinnon |
135 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |