| 1 |
On 11/12/2013 00:11, Norman Invasion wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10 December 2013 15:33, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> On 10/12/2013 20:28, Bruce Hill wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 05:52:36PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>> |
| 7 |
>>>> The only thing portage can do is assume you want everything to work |
| 8 |
>>>> under all installed interpreters. If you want to restrict the list of |
| 9 |
>>>> installed interpreters, use the relevant settings in make.conf. Python |
| 10 |
>>>> has PYTHON_TARGETS and SINGLE_PYTHON_TARGET for this, I don't know what |
| 11 |
>>>> the ruby equivalent is. |
| 12 |
>>>> -- |
| 13 |
>>>> Alan McKinnon |
| 14 |
>>>> alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>>> mingdao@workstation ~ $ grep ruby /etc/portage/make.conf |
| 17 |
>>> RUBY_TARGETS="ruby20" |
| 18 |
>>> |
| 19 |
>>> Can't imagine you didn't know that. Ruby hater? :D |
| 20 |
>>> |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> You could say that: |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> $ grep -ir -C1 ruby /etc/portage |
| 26 |
>> /etc/portage/package.use/package.use- # I see no need for lvm thin |
| 27 |
>> volumes. And it needs thin-provisioning-tools |
| 28 |
>> /etc/portage/package.use/package.use: # which needs ruby. I do not want |
| 29 |
>> ruby. |
| 30 |
>> /etc/portage/package.use/package.use- sys-fs/lvm2 -thin |
| 31 |
>> |
| 32 |
>> |
| 33 |
>> |
| 34 |
>> But the real reason I don't have ruby is I don't have a use for it |
| 35 |
>> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> $ cat /etc/portage/package.mask |
| 38 |
> dev-lang/ruby* |
| 39 |
> dev-ruby/* |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> Because sh, bash, awk, make, scons, cmake, perl, |
| 42 |
> & two different version of python certainly aren't enough. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
You left out sed :-) |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-- |
| 48 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 49 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives