| 1 |
Laurence Perkins wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 16:54 -0600, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Howdy, |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> As some know, I've accumulated a lot of videos. I googled around and |
| 6 |
>> found some software but not sure based on what they claim if they |
| 7 |
>> will |
| 8 |
>> do something I'm looking for. I installed a couple but not real big |
| 9 |
>> on |
| 10 |
>> how they work. One requires me to add videos, one at a time. I have |
| 11 |
>> over 20,000 videos now. Some are short youtube type videos, some are |
| 12 |
>> long videos. It could take me years to add them all doing it one at |
| 13 |
>> a |
| 14 |
>> time. Needless to say, that one didn't last long. The biggest thing |
| 15 |
>> I'm looking for, software that can tell me what videos have a low |
| 16 |
>> resolution. As a example, some videos I downloaded a long time ago |
| 17 |
>> have |
| 18 |
>> been updated to have higher resolutions. I may have one that is a |
| 19 |
>> 360P, |
| 20 |
>> or even less, but I may can locate a new version that is HD or even |
| 21 |
>> very |
| 22 |
>> HD. I'd like software that will tell me this sort of info as well as |
| 23 |
>> other nifty features as well. Obviously, I'd like to start with the |
| 24 |
>> lower resolution videos first. |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
>> So far, I have installed Griffith and GCStar. I been googling for |
| 27 |
>> others but some either are not in the tree or I already know they |
| 28 |
>> won't |
| 29 |
>> do one thing I'd like to see. I'd also like to be able to point it |
| 30 |
>> to a |
| 31 |
>> directory and let it build the database on its own. Adding them one |
| 32 |
>> at |
| 33 |
>> a time manually just isn't feasible at all. |
| 34 |
>> |
| 35 |
>> Does anyone know of a software package that will sort a lot of videos |
| 36 |
>> by |
| 37 |
>> resolution as well as track other things as well? It could be that |
| 38 |
>> what |
| 39 |
>> I'd like to have doesn't exist at all. Then again, maybe I just |
| 40 |
>> haven't |
| 41 |
>> found it yet. ;-) |
| 42 |
>> |
| 43 |
>> Thanks. |
| 44 |
>> |
| 45 |
>> Dale |
| 46 |
>> |
| 47 |
>> :-) :-) |
| 48 |
>> |
| 49 |
> Digikam might be worth a try. It does some pretty advanced stuff with |
| 50 |
> photos and I think at this point it can do quite a bit of the sorting |
| 51 |
> and searching stuff with videos as well. I've not tried it with videos |
| 52 |
> myself though so I can't make any promises. |
| 53 |
> |
| 54 |
> LMP |
| 55 |
> |
| 56 |
> |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
I have and use that for pictures.+AKA- Maybe it is something recently added |
| 60 |
that I missed.+AKA- I'll look into that some more.+AKA- Since I already use it, |
| 61 |
it would be nice.+AKA- I just use it to track what is downloaded and what is |
| 62 |
not so I use it as a basic tool.+AKA- I used to use gtkam, I think that is |
| 63 |
the name.+AKA- It got a bug of some sort so I switched to digikam several |
| 64 |
years ago.+AKA- |
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
Thanks. |
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
Dale |
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
:-)+AKA- :-)+AKA- |
Archives