| 1 |
On 17/04/12 19:39, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:41:55 +0300 |
| 3 |
> Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On 17/04/12 18:34, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> On 17/04/12 18:10, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>> On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:01:43 +0300 |
| 8 |
>>>> Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 9 |
>>>> |
| 10 |
>>>>> emerge --depclean seems to have bugged out for me: |
| 11 |
>>>>> |
| 12 |
>>>>> * Dependencies could not be completely resolved due to |
| 13 |
>>>>> * the following required packages not being installed: |
| 14 |
>>>>> * |
| 15 |
>>>>> * =dev-libs/openssl-0.9.8* pulled in by: |
| 16 |
>>>>> * app-emulation/vmware-workstation-8.0.2.591240 |
| 17 |
>>>>> * |
| 18 |
>>>>> * dev-libs/openssl:0.9.8 pulled in by: |
| 19 |
>>>>> * www-client/google-chrome-19.0.1084.24_beta131971 |
| 20 |
>>>>> |
| 21 |
>>>>> It says to do a "emerge --update --newuse --deep --with-bdeps=y |
| 22 |
>>>>> @world". Which is what I just did to begin with (and running it |
| 23 |
>>>>> again doesn't result in anything getting emerged.) |
| 24 |
>>>>> [...] |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> One thing that strikes me as a possibility is that the highest numbered |
| 27 |
> version has the lower slot number (0). I know that SLOT names are |
| 28 |
> just names and not supposed to be treated like they form an order, but |
| 29 |
> I've seen odd things like this before. I think KDE did it to me once. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> What happens if you emerge openssl:0.9.8, let it go into world, then |
| 32 |
> run depclean? The build takes 2 minutes and you can easily remove it |
| 33 |
> from world later. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Nope, nothing changed. |
Archives