| 1 |
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Florian Philipp <lists@×××××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am 28.11.2011 20:14, schrieb Michael Mol: |
| 3 |
>> Upstream devs might take issue with them, but I'm still not sure they |
| 4 |
>> should affect bug reports of build-time failures. I would *hope* |
| 5 |
>> upstream gcc is doing tests on its own build tools compiled with its |
| 6 |
>> graphite optimizations. I don't know about make and autotools, though. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Agreed. Even if upstream for failing package doesn't want to handle it, |
| 10 |
> you can still redirect it to the gcc folks. Even a bug report flagged |
| 11 |
> WONTFIX or INVALID is helpful for the next user who stumbles upon weird |
| 12 |
> compile issues. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I'd love to see what CSmith is making of graphite. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
http://embed.cs.utah.edu/csmith/ |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
:wq |
Archives