Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Daniel Troeder <daniel@×××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Normal disk speed?
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:52:16
Message-Id: 4CACC555.309@admin-box.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Normal disk speed? by Adam Carter
1 On 10/06/2010 10:04 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
2 > FYI some braindead benchmarking, reiserfs vs ext4, kernel 2.6.35-gentoo-r8
3 >
4 > Copy same DVD image from internal reiserfs drive to freshly formatted
5 > external drive;
6 > reiserfs 1m37.530s
7 > ext4 3m15.074s
8 >
9 > Then image copy on that external drive;
10 > # time cp CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso2
11 > # time cp CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD.iso3
12 > reiser 1m44.719s and 1m51.441s
13 > ext4 3m24.337s and 4m30.534s
14 >
15 > Not that is matters, but create filesystem on 2TB drive;
16 > reiserfs 1m17.373s
17 > ext4 6m3.421s
18 >
19 > Didnt see that coming, I guess i'll stick with reiser3....
20 WOW! Those differences are crazy!
21
22 Please - I know benchmarking takes a lot of time - but could you check
23 something: the behavior those fs have at what time they flush data from
24 cache to disk is very different. Have you made sure that you measured
25 the time it really needs? I mean the difference between:
26
27 $ sync; time cp source dest
28 and
29 $ sync; time (cp source dest; sync)
30
31 Only the last measures somewhat correctly.
32
33 I'm irritated, because ext4 is extends based, and should behave much
34 better with big files than reiser3... not only less fragmentation, but
35 should also be faster...
36
37 Bye,
38 Daniel
39
40 --
41 PGP key @ http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de/pks/lookup?search=0xBB9D4887&op=get
42 # gpg --recv-keys --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net 0xBB9D4887

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Normal disk speed? Adam Carter <adamcarter3@×××××.com>