1 |
On 12/23/08, Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
2 |
> On Montag 22 Dezember 2008, Arttu V. wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> *If you're so sure it's the html in his emails, then why don't you |
6 |
>> answer his questions about Gnome?* |
7 |
> |
8 |
> well, I saw his mails - and I did not react to them, because I don't use |
9 |
> gnome |
10 |
|
11 |
Sorry, that was meant for the subscribers of the "html-attachment |
12 |
conspiracy theory", not you or your text personally. I agree, it was |
13 |
unnclearly typed and should have started with "To all html-theory |
14 |
believers:", but I plead for my current slight fever and cough for |
15 |
minor typos and misthoughts. :) |
16 |
|
17 |
> since the 2.0 disaster. Since then I am a happy KDE-only user. |
18 |
> Not using gnome makes me skip gnome threads automatically - the few things I |
19 |
> remember back from the 1.4 days won't help anyway. |
20 |
|
21 |
I run KDE as well (so maybe I'm biased to comment about gnome-related |
22 |
stuff?) and recently fixed a very trivial and minor bug in esound |
23 |
(part of Gnome, possibly outdated?). Happily filed a bug upstream. A |
24 |
month counting so far with no changes to the bug at all, while the |
25 |
Gentoo Gnome team threw the one-line patch in the tree within hours, I |
26 |
think. |
27 |
|
28 |
That's my recent experience with helping with gnome issues. Not really |
29 |
exciting, so I'm skipping the gnome-threads when busy, which is quite |
30 |
often. Gnome-help is under the rock someplace. |
31 |
|
32 |
KDE is known to break constantly (double that for KDE4), so perhaps it |
33 |
has more fixing knowledge "spread out there"? This still doesn't say |
34 |
that KDE is better than Gnome. When busy I just love using Ubuntu -- |
35 |
it shows what Gnome can be: no fuss, pleasant etc (but the OK-buttons |
36 |
are backwards! ;) ), while Kubuntu is ... a bit clunky feeling. |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
Arttu V. |