1 |
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:24:58 +0200 |
2 |
Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 15/12/13 06:39, »Q« wrote: |
5 |
> > It looks to me as if the removal of nvidia-drivers-325.15 was a |
6 |
> > mistake, but I've got a lot going on in the meat world right now, |
7 |
> > and I don't want to file a bug if I've simply gotten confused. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > I run mostly stable amd64. I have 325.15 installed, and nothing |
10 |
> > regarding nvidia-drivers in /etc/portage/package/accept_keywords, |
11 |
> > so I *think* 325.15 was the latest stable and shouldn't have been |
12 |
> > removed for being old. The removal makes portage want to downgrade |
13 |
> > the package for me. |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > I see in the changelog: |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > 14 Dec 2013; Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> |
18 |
> > -nvidia-drivers-325.15.ebuild: Old. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > [...] |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > 02 Nov 2013; Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> |
23 |
> > -nvidia-drivers-325.08.ebuild, nvidia-drivers-325.15.ebuild: |
24 |
> > Stable for AMD64 x86 too. |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > Could someone confirm or set me straight? |
27 |
> |
28 |
> I confirm. The latest unmasked version is 319.76 (I'm using that |
29 |
> one.) 331.20 is also in portage (latest upstream stable), but it's |
30 |
> masked in portage. Usually, if you try to explicitly emerge something |
31 |
> that's masked, you get a message telling you why it's masked: |
32 |
> |
33 |
> $ emerge -p =x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-331.20 |
34 |
> ... |
35 |
> [ebuild U #] x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-331.20 [319.76] |
36 |
> |
37 |
> The following mask changes are necessary to proceed: |
38 |
> (see "package.unmask" in the portage(5) man page for more details) |
39 |
> # required by =x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-331.20 (argument) |
40 |
> # /usr/portage/profiles/targets/desktop/kde/package.mask: |
41 |
> # Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@g.o> (1 Dec 2013) |
42 |
> # Mask recent nvidia drivers because of sigprocmask corruption, |
43 |
> bug 487558 |
44 |
> # (this hits akonadi and makes significant parts of KDE hang) |
45 |
> =x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-331.20 |
46 |
> |
47 |
> So it was masked due to conflicts with KDE. If you're not using KDE, |
48 |
> it might be safe to unmask it. |
49 |
|
50 |
I was using 331.20, but I do use KDE and it was causing me those hangs. |
51 |
At the time 331.20 was masked, I switched to 325.15. Now that 325.15 |
52 |
has been removed from the tree, the latest stable is 319.19, and |
53 |
that's what portage wants to downgrade me to as of yesterday. |
54 |
|
55 |
I guess my question boils down to: Was 325.15 ever stabilized? |
56 |
|
57 |
If it was stabilized, it shouldn't have been removed simply due oldness. |
58 |
|
59 |
If it was *not* stabilized, the only issue is between my ears. |