Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "»Q«" <boxcars@×××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: nvidia-drivers 325.15 removal
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:29:28
Message-Id: 20131215102853.3a19dc78@fuchsia
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: nvidia-drivers 325.15 removal by Nikos Chantziaras
1 On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:24:58 +0200
2 Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > On 15/12/13 06:39, »Q« wrote:
5 > > It looks to me as if the removal of nvidia-drivers-325.15 was a
6 > > mistake, but I've got a lot going on in the meat world right now,
7 > > and I don't want to file a bug if I've simply gotten confused.
8 > >
9 > > I run mostly stable amd64. I have 325.15 installed, and nothing
10 > > regarding nvidia-drivers in /etc/portage/package/accept_keywords,
11 > > so I *think* 325.15 was the latest stable and shouldn't have been
12 > > removed for being old. The removal makes portage want to downgrade
13 > > the package for me.
14 > >
15 > > I see in the changelog:
16 > >
17 > > 14 Dec 2013; Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
18 > > -nvidia-drivers-325.15.ebuild: Old.
19 > >
20 > > [...]
21 > >
22 > > 02 Nov 2013; Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
23 > > -nvidia-drivers-325.08.ebuild, nvidia-drivers-325.15.ebuild:
24 > > Stable for AMD64 x86 too.
25 > >
26 > > Could someone confirm or set me straight?
27 >
28 > I confirm. The latest unmasked version is 319.76 (I'm using that
29 > one.) 331.20 is also in portage (latest upstream stable), but it's
30 > masked in portage. Usually, if you try to explicitly emerge something
31 > that's masked, you get a message telling you why it's masked:
32 >
33 > $ emerge -p =x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-331.20
34 > ...
35 > [ebuild U #] x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-331.20 [319.76]
36 >
37 > The following mask changes are necessary to proceed:
38 > (see "package.unmask" in the portage(5) man page for more details)
39 > # required by =x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-331.20 (argument)
40 > # /usr/portage/profiles/targets/desktop/kde/package.mask:
41 > # Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@g.o> (1 Dec 2013)
42 > # Mask recent nvidia drivers because of sigprocmask corruption,
43 > bug 487558
44 > # (this hits akonadi and makes significant parts of KDE hang)
45 > =x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-331.20
46 >
47 > So it was masked due to conflicts with KDE. If you're not using KDE,
48 > it might be safe to unmask it.
49
50 I was using 331.20, but I do use KDE and it was causing me those hangs.
51 At the time 331.20 was masked, I switched to 325.15. Now that 325.15
52 has been removed from the tree, the latest stable is 319.19, and
53 that's what portage wants to downgrade me to as of yesterday.
54
55 I guess my question boils down to: Was 325.15 ever stabilized?
56
57 If it was stabilized, it shouldn't have been removed simply due oldness.
58
59 If it was *not* stabilized, the only issue is between my ears.