| 1 |
On Friday 10 December 2010, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am 2010-12-10 16:41, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: |
| 3 |
> > On Friday 10 December 2010, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Am 09.12.2010 18:21, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: |
| 5 |
> >>> Put /boot on raid1, / on raid6. Don't bother with lvm - it is |
| 6 |
> >>> just another layer that can go wrong. |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >> You mean "don't use lvm for /" ? ... for other stuff it's very |
| 9 |
> >> useful, isn't it? |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > no, I mean don't use lvm. It is a very compley, easily broken layer |
| 12 |
> > reducing data safety. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> ok .... hmmm |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> > There is no need for lvm with bind mounting and ln -s. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I don't fully get that yet ... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
well, what is so 'great' about lvm? That you can shove around free space where |
| 21 |
it is needed. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
You can do the same with bind mounting. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
With the additional bonus that mount simply works. Unlike lvm. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Btw, does lvm still eat barriers? |
Archives