| 1 |
On 3 October 2011 20:47, Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello people! |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Now, I have the same question as this guy: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=66651 |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I.e., what is the most robust filesystem for Linux? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The *most* robust? Probably something seriously expensive from IBM or similar. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I'd go with ReiserFS or Ext3. Both are very good. I use ReiserFS |
| 13 |
pretty much everywhere. No running-out-of-inode problems with ReiserFS |
| 14 |
so I prefer it over Ext3. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> The box will be used as a gateway/firewall for a branch office, so I really |
| 17 |
> couldn't care less about filesystem performance. But the utility power there |
| 18 |
> is horrendous, so I need something that can shrug off a catastrophic power |
| 19 |
> loss, and/or very fast fsck. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Then why not simply use a LiveCD like OpenWall? Unbreakable file |
| 22 |
system as it's all read-only (or RAM). Can't beat read-only. :-) |
Archives