1 |
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> You did post emerge output using -t and it shows up at the top level |
3 |
> which is a bit odd, it implies portage wants to update opencv anyway, |
4 |
> not as a result of it being a dep. |
5 |
|
6 |
I agree it's odd and I agree it appears that portage isn't updating |
7 |
opencv because it's a dep. FWIW, an "emerge -pv opencv" wants to |
8 |
reinstall opencv-2.4.5 while an "emerge -Dauv world" wants to upgrade |
9 |
me to 2.4.8. |
10 |
|
11 |
> grep -r opencv /etc/portage |
12 |
|
13 |
Yes, I was looking at that too. Nothing interesting there: |
14 |
|
15 |
jane ~ # grep -r opencv /etc/portage/ |
16 |
/etc/portage/package.use:media-libs/opencv cuda opencl |
17 |
/etc/portage/package.mask:# 2014-03-13: Hold off on opencv upgrade |
18 |
/etc/portage/package.mask:>media-libs/opencv-2.4.5 |
19 |
|
20 |
> equery depends opencv |
21 |
|
22 |
Also uninteresting: |
23 |
|
24 |
jane ~ # equery depends opencv |
25 |
* These packages depend on opencv: |
26 |
jane ~ # |
27 |
|
28 |
Chris |