| 1 |
Sascha Lucas wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> emerge -1 --usepkg --pretend --verbose pkg_spec_from_equery |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> then the change in USE-Flags are showen and my _correct_ binarys are used. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
There's probably a good reason for it being the way it is, but it |
| 9 |
doesn't sound as transparent as we might like. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
A further interesting scenario might be to have a binary package |
| 12 |
available built with different USE flags to those on the target machine, |
| 13 |
and seeing if it gets installed or not. I guess it shouldn't. But then |
| 14 |
there's the CFLAGS issue as well, and I'm even more unsure how that's |
| 15 |
supposed to be handled. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I'm still pretty new to Gentoo, but is this perhaps related to the |
| 18 |
feature I've read about (and maybe misremembered) regarding only |
| 19 |
packages that you explicity emerge going into world (dependencies |
| 20 |
don't)? I wonder if you'd see different results if you explicitly |
| 21 |
emerged cups rather than it having been implicity emerged due to a |
| 22 |
dependency. By doing the emerge you described you've 'promoted' those |
| 23 |
packages from implicit to explicit emerge. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
IanC |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives