| 1 |
Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 19:21:44 schrieb walt: |
| 2 |
> Two days ago after updating world on my ~amd64, at least two apps |
| 3 |
> can't find libssl.so.12 even though it's right where it should be. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> One difference I find between my working x86 and my broken ~amd64 |
| 6 |
> is the output of ldconfig -p: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> x86 machine: |
| 9 |
> #ldconfig -p | grep ssl3.so |
| 10 |
> libssl3.so.12 (libc6) => /usr/lib/nss/libssl3.so.12 <== minor number |
| 11 |
> libssl3.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/nss/libssl3.so |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> ~amd64 machine: |
| 14 |
> #ldconfig -p | grep ssl3.do |
| 15 |
> libssl3.so (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib64/nss/libssl3.so |
| 16 |
> libssl3.so (libc6) => /opt/flash-libcompat/libssl3.so |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Note that the minor number (.12) doesn't show up even though there |
| 19 |
> is a correct and proper symlink for it in /usr/lib64/nss. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Another source of confusion for me is that the programs that need |
| 22 |
> libssl3.so.12 are both linked against libssl3.so (no minor number) |
| 23 |
> but the error message specifically says that libssl3.so.12 can't be |
| 24 |
> found. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Can anyone here make sense out of this info? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Not really, but I've seen this on my box at work today. The interesting thing |
| 29 |
here was that for the affected program, evolution, libssl3.so showed up four |
| 30 |
times in ldd output, where three entries showed "not found" while the forth |
| 31 |
showed the location of the lib. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Interestingly, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to /usr/lib/nss resolved the issue. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Bye... |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Dirk |
Archives