| 1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:03 on Friday 19 November 2010, Nikos |
| 2 |
Chantziaras did opine thusly: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > Perhaps distros will pick up on this and offer other criteria, maybe |
| 5 |
> > something like a profile selectable at boot-time or maybe even runtime. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > What I would like to see is flash goes into it's own group and gets |
| 8 |
> > throttled. Everything else running under KDE is in a different group and |
| 9 |
> > left to run full speed |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I was kind of hoping this would give results in the same league as the |
| 12 |
> BFS patch, but it seems it something that needs tweaking and doesn't |
| 13 |
> "just work for everything." It doesn't look like it's for desktop |
| 14 |
> users, only for "make -j999" people. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Maybe I expected more, but I don't seem to feel the improvement in Con's |
| 17 |
scheduler. Perhaps it's a perception thing. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
About two months ago I did reboot into a gentoo kernel and things did feel a |
| 20 |
little different but not in a way I could put my fingers on. I put it down to |
| 21 |
running a huge compile in screen. I *do* feel the incremental improvements in |
| 22 |
KDE since about 4.3, mostly because new versions come out rapidly. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
What do you perceive with BFS vs mainline/gentoo/whatever? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives