| 1 |
»Q« wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:54:37 +0000 |
| 3 |
> Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On 29 March 2013, at 03:36, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>> ... |
| 7 |
>>>>> I can only imagine he was pointing out that you have a single CPU |
| 8 |
>>>>> with four cores in it. |
| 9 |
>>>> You're right, of course. I should have said /cores/. |
| 10 |
>>> Cores or CPUs.. in this context it's *almost*, __NOT EXACTLY__ same. |
| 11 |
>> Which is exactly what was so twitch inducing! |
| 12 |
> Whatever you do, don't read the first sentence at |
| 13 |
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-core_processor>. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Especially this FIRST part: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
"A *multi-core processor* is a single computing |
| 21 |
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computing> component . . ." |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
So, it is a SINGLE component. To me, CPUs means having more than one |
| 24 |
CPU component, such as dual CPUs or even quad CPUs which used to be |
| 25 |
fairly common. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I have a single CPU computer. It has 4 cores but a single CPU. I hope |
| 28 |
to upgrade one day to a 8 core CPU. I'll still have a single CPU |
| 29 |
component installed tho. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
This is getting really funny. ROFL You can tell when the list is |
| 32 |
getting slow when we start parsing each word and each words meaning. ;-) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Dale |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
:-) :-) |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives