| 1 |
On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 11:15 +0000, Ivan Novick wrote: |
| 2 |
> Does anyone know if there is a gentoo package for normal VI, ie not vim?? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
You don't want normal vi, trust me on this. : ) |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
We do have "nvi", (elvis, but I'm not sure there) and if you're |
| 7 |
desperate for the original feeling of loss, the busybox vi |
| 8 |
implementation. However, the -classic- vi source is a headache and its |
| 9 |
use of terminfo so horrendous that it causes brain-hemorrhaging if you |
| 10 |
try to update it. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
//Spider |
| 14 |
ex vi maintainer. Now suffering from hemorrhaging brainzombies. |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
begin .signature |
| 17 |
Tortured users / Laughing in pain |
| 18 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 19 |
end |
Archives