Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: No HW acceleraton on radeon Mobility X300 with linux-2.6.36-r5, mesa-7.9, xorg-server-1.9.2 and video-ati-6.13.2
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:56:44
Message-Id: AANLkTikU9iR1sNoR71VYzkpKUWTUHw75LFzHaqUg46UW@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: No HW acceleraton on radeon Mobility X300 with linux-2.6.36-r5, mesa-7.9, xorg-server-1.9.2 and video-ati-6.13.2 by Mick
1 On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > On Wednesday 19 January 2011 16:05:11 Mark Knecht wrote:
3 >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >> <SNIP>
5 >>
6 >> > I have seen some seriously spurious results from glxgears over the
7 >> > years.  I recall reading somewhere that if your fps is less that 100,
8 >> > it may be caused by your screen refresh rate being out of keel with
9 >> > your card or something like that.  glxgears is good for one thing -
10 >> > showing you by means of a GUI that 3D graphics work on your set up.
11 >> >
12 >> >  http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Glxgears_is_not_a_Benchmark
13 >> >
14 >> > --
15 >> > Regards,
16 >> > Mick
17 >>
18 >> I COMPLETELY agree! However I know of no other graphics benchmarking
19 >> app that's likely to be on a list member's machine and is easy to run.
20 >>
21 >> I'd be really interested in a common Gentoo way of measuring graphics
22 >> performance but I don't know of one.
23 >
24 > I have used gtkperf when I was benchmarking different settings on a box:
25 >
26 > $ eix -l gtkperf
27 > * app-benchmarks/gtkperf
28 >     Available versions:
29 >                (~)     0.40 "~amd64 ~ppc ~x86" [nls]
30 >     Homepage:            http://gtkperf.sourceforge.net/
31 >     Description:         Application designed to test GTK+ performance
32 >
33 > Alternatively, most people who are interested in gaming use demos from the
34 > games they play.
35 > --
36 > Regards,
37 > Mick
38 >
39
40 Hey Mick,
41 I updated the the git version of the xf86-video-ati driver this
42 morning, but am still using all the stable versions of everything
43 else. I tried gtkperf. Not satifying at all in terms of demonstrating
44 anything with 3d performance.
45
46 We need a better benchmark! I'm going to go look around a bit for
47 something more fun...
48
49 Cheers,
50 Mark