Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now?
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:06:36
Message-Id: 4E02C924.4090000@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? by Neil Bothwick
1 Neil Bothwick wrote:
2 > On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:34:35 -0500, Dale wrote:
3 >
4 >
5 >> root@fireball / # eix cantor
6 >> [I] kde-base/cantor
7 >> Available versions: (4) 4.6.2{tbz2} 4.6.3{tbz2} (~)4.6.4{tbz2}
8 >> {+R aqua debug +handbook kdeenablefinal kdeprefix ps}
9 >> Installed versions: 4.6.4(4){tbz2}(01:24:34 PM
10 >> 06/22/2011)(handbook -R -aqua -debug -kdeenablefinal -ps)
11 >> Homepage: http://www.kde.org/
12 >> Description: KDE4 interface for doing mathematics and
13 >> scientific computing
14 >>
15 >> root@fireball / #
16 >>
17 >> You may not need it unless you jump into the menu and go to Education>
18 >> Mathematics> Cantor. I don't even know how it works so if you are the
19 >> same as me, you won't need it.
20 >>
21 > So why are you installing it, and all its dependencies, on the one hand,
22 > and complaining about bloat on the other? Surely installing stuff you
23 > don't need is the very definition of bloat.
24 >
25 >
26
27 But it installed stuff either way. Instread of ABD, I got WXYZ because
28 of dependencies. It's not that I want them, it's that portage needs
29 them to make a package that I do want happy. This reminds me of the six
30 of one or half a dozen of the other. This may be nine of one tho. lol
31
32 Dale
33
34 :-) :-)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>