| 1 |
On 01/20/11 17:08, Nuno J. Silva wrote: |
| 2 |
> Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> On 01/20/2011 11:14 AM, |
| 5 |
>> hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_hare@×××××××.com |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I am against hard limits on username lengths, but I think that |
| 8 |
> uuencoding the result of gzipping that address yelds a more readable |
| 9 |
> address. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Fun fact (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.5.3.1.1): |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
4.5.3.1.1. Local-part |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
The maximum total length of a user name or other local-part is 64 |
| 16 |
octets. |
Archives