Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger@××××××××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: microcode applied?
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 14:33:27
Message-Id: pan$15b41$11164132$f75b6f05$e61b4f43@applied-asynchrony.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: microcode applied? by "Holger Hoffstätte"
1 On Tue, 09 Jan 2018 14:21:10 +0000, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
2
3 > On Mon, 08 Jan 2018 11:53:58 +0000, Mick wrote:
4 >
5 >> On Monday, 8 January 2018 09:05:02 GMT Max Zettlmeißl wrote:
6 >>> It seems like there are no microcode updates for your specific CPU
7 >>> bundled in linux-firmware.
8 >>
9 >> Only two out of three Intel boxen here report an early update of microcode in
10 >> dmesg. Even when they do, it is not certain the latest firmware has brought
11 >> new code:
12 >>
13 >> [ 0.000000] microcode: microcode updated early to revision 0x7, date =
14 >> 2013-08-20
15 >>
16 >> This date above puzzles me. Is it that on this PC's CPU the Intel bugs cannot
17 >> be ameliorated by the latest intel-ucode release, or is it that Intel have not
18 >> bothered to release microcode revisions for all their products.
19 >
20 > The latter - older CPUs simply don't get updates. My server & workstation
21 > are i5/i7 SandyBridge built in early 2012, and their last microcode updates
22 > are from 2013 as well.
23 >
24 >> Therefore if microcode for my CPU was included in intel-ucode releases since
25 >> 2017-01-01, is this the same unchanged microcode being released since the date
26 >> reported in dmesg of 2013-08-20?
27 >
28 > Seems like it.
29
30 Just read that Intel plans to ship microcode updates for CPUs built in and
31 after *2013*, so I guess that means anything after & including Ivy Bridge.
32
33 Announcement: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlJ9zB74G_U
34
35 All my machines will be running AMD very soon. I need more cores anyway.
36
37 -h