| 1 |
>> > Does anybody know more about this "security flaw in the open-source Linux |
| 2 |
>> > GNU C Library" |
| 3 |
>> > |
| 4 |
>> > http://www.theglobeandmail.com/technology/linux-makers-release-patch-to-thwart-new-ghost-cyber-threat/article22662060/?cmpid=rss1 |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> I updated a system of mine that was using an old version of glibc and |
| 8 |
>> rebooted. I can't do a full emerge world there or use various other |
| 9 |
>> portage tools due to the peculiarities of my current situation. Could |
| 10 |
>> I still be vulnerable? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Your system may be vulnerable to this issue only if you have |
| 13 |
> packages statically linked with vulnerable glibc libs, so most |
| 14 |
> likely — no. But your system may be affected by a plenty of other |
| 15 |
> issues in various packages. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> At the very least you should apply all GLSAs to your system: while |
| 18 |
> they don't encompass all vulnerabilities, they should warn you |
| 19 |
> about most common and important ones. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I don't think I have USE=static anywhere. Any way to confirm? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I've been watching glsa.gentoo.org (a little dismayed that this glibc |
| 25 |
vulnerability isn't there yet) but you prompted me to give glsa-check |
| 26 |
a try. It's telling me I'm vulnerable to some that I clearly am not |
| 27 |
vulnerable to. Do I need to clear a cache somewhere? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
- Grant |
Archives