1 |
On Sunday 25 February 2007 22:45, Agg wrote: |
2 |
> on 02/26/2007 12:27 AM Willie Wong wrote the following: |
3 |
> > On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:38:35PM +0200, Penguin Lover Agg squawked: |
4 |
> >> You mean an *off-topic* with a valid reply-to address is still |
5 |
> >> *off-topic*. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Oh, come on, why can't you have the decency to spam^H post off-topic |
8 |
> > from just one e-mail account? It is annoying to have to kill-file |
9 |
> > multiple ones. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> If you had the decency to accept off-topic as off-topic, spam as spam, |
12 |
> simple as simple, and hypocrisy as hypocrisy... |
13 |
|
14 |
You seem to be evidently void of any sense of relevance and proportionality. |
15 |
This is a 'gentoo-user' mailing list intended to serve the needs of |
16 |
gentoo-users; specific support and discussion needs which are relevant to the |
17 |
Gentoo meta-distribution. Had you been around for any length of time you |
18 |
would have observed the fact that "off-topic" on this list is invariably |
19 |
still relevant to IT, computers, Linux and related topics. |
20 |
|
21 |
After many people told you that your topic is considered irrelevant spam for |
22 |
this list and that you are consuming unnecessary bandwidth, you continue to |
23 |
annoy with your persistence to spam. Exhibiting a messianic zeal for a good |
24 |
cause in this inappropriate way, has ended up causing a disservice to an |
25 |
otherwise laudable cause. Your ends do not justify your means and in this |
26 |
case label you as fanatic idiot - because you have no sense of relevance, |
27 |
proportionality and respect for your audience. |
28 |
|
29 |
Couldn't you just find a *suitable* ML to raise your issue and leave us alone? |
30 |
-- |
31 |
Regards, |
32 |
Mick |