| 1 |
Rafael Fernández López schrieb: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Second thing that I'd improve is a security one. I know that "emerge" |
| 4 |
> is a very cared package, but it is a script. Suppose that someone |
| 5 |
> commits portage with a emerge failure in its code (he forgot a comma |
| 6 |
> !!)... if someone updates portage won't be able to update it again |
| 7 |
> because it will fail ever and ever again... So I suggest to have a |
| 8 |
> backuped emerge script that we are sure that worked (like the last |
| 9 |
> emerge tool that was used), and if the new emerge tool is mistaken (so |
| 10 |
> that user doesn't need to know python) only has to run "regenemerge" for |
| 11 |
> example, and will have the latest emerge working tool. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I disagree with that as well. Changes should only happen in the keyworded |
| 14 |
packages (ie. ~x86, ...). That's the testing area of Gentoo. If a package |
| 15 |
breaks in testing: "Fine"! That's what's testing is for. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Alexander Skwar |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Im Endeffekt war alles cooler als letztes Jahr, obwohl |
| 20 |
ich bis Donnerstag dachte, das es nicht geht. |
| 21 |
-- Igor Gilitschenski |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives