1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
add to your /etc/portage/package.license : |
4 |
|
5 |
net-im/skype skype-eula |
6 |
|
7 |
This will unmask skype. |
8 |
|
9 |
regards, |
10 |
|
11 |
Boris |
12 |
|
13 |
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 08:27, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
14 |
> This is confusing me ... |
15 |
> |
16 |
> I have skype-2.0.0.72 installed for some time now. eix -l skype shows: |
17 |
> |
18 |
> [I] net-im/skype |
19 |
> Available versions: |
20 |
> 2.0.0.72!m!s "amd64 x86" [qt-static] |
21 |
> ~ 2.1.0.81+i!m!s "~amd64 ~x86" [qt-static] |
22 |
> Installed versions: 2.0.0.72!m!s(06:22:21 04/15/09)(-qt-static) |
23 |
> Homepage: http://www.skype.com/ |
24 |
> Description: A P2P-VoiceIP client. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> However, after updating portage I see: |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Calculating dependencies... done! |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 kB |
31 |
> |
32 |
> !!! The following installed packages are masked: |
33 |
> - net-im/skype-2.0.0.72 (masked by: skype-eula license(s)) |
34 |
> A copy of the 'skype-eula' license is located at '/usr/portage/licenses/skype- |
35 |
> eula'. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Is portage telling me that I need to do something about the eula? eix does |
38 |
> not show this version as being masked. |
39 |
> -- |
40 |
> Regards, |
41 |
> Mick |
42 |
> |
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
42 |