Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Module philosophy: Compile-in or Load
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 17:25:56
Message-Id: 358eca8f0606171008w3af0ad89m826a9b1b1a6e598b@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Module philosophy: Compile-in or Load by "Anthony E. Caudel"
1 On 17/06/06, Anthony E. Caudel <acaudel@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > Mick wrote:
3 > > On 13/06/06, Ryan Tandy <tarpman@×××××.com> wrote:
4 > >> Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
5 > >> >
6 > >> > How? "make modules_install" or the whole thing: "make && make
7 > >> > modules_install" then just modprobe the new module?
8 > >>
9 > >> # make modules modules_install
10 > >> # modprobe <module>
11 > >
12 > > Do you also need to run "&& make install" or is it not necessary to
13 > > copy anything to /boot?
14 >
15 > Not necessary.
16
17 Of course not necessary for the kernel (as Michael Weyershäuser
18 already said), but what about the copy of the .config file?
19 --
20 Regards,
21 Mick
22
23 --
24 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Module philosophy: Compile-in or Load Erik Westenbroek <mistereastenstream@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Module philosophy: Compile-in or Load "Michael Weyershäuser" <thedude0001@×××.de>