1 |
Dale wrote:
|
2 |
> Raffaele BELARDI wrote: |
3 |
>> I have three users on my ~amd64 gentoo including myself. The two other |
4 |
>> users have identical and very limited rights. For me and one user flash |
5 |
>> in seamonkey works fine, for the other user it is blocked by seamonkey |
6 |
>> being 'insecure', although the seamonkey binary and the flash plugin |
7 |
>> (www-plugins/adobe-flash-11.2.202.637) are installed system-wide. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> I don't understand why the different behaviour, any suggestions? |
10 |
>> |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Notice how I have two |
13 |
> versions of adobe-flash installed? I don't think that is normal. I |
14 |
> manually -C the older version and now youtube and such works fine. It |
15 |
> now looks like this: |
16 |
> |
17 |
> You may want to see if two versions are installed at the same time. It |
18 |
> appears that if it is, it tries to use the older version. Don't ask me |
19 |
> how two versions can be installed at the same time tho. I dunno. I |
20 |
> don't think it is supposed to do that for this package tho. The command |
21 |
> I used is this: |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
I understood that the -11 is required for some (NPAPI whateverthatis)
|
25 |
browsers including Firefox[1]. Actually I recently tried to remove -11
|
26 |
from another system and mythbrowser stopped displaying flash. Anyway, I
|
27 |
will try the suggestion with the seamonkey browser.
|
28 |
|
29 |
raffaele
|
30 |
|
31 |
[1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Adobe_Flash |