1 |
On Tuesday 27 May 2014 11:32:22 Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:21 AM, J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
> > Does anyone know how these will handle (and perform) with a possible 300+ |
4 |
> > snapshots per filesystem (or volume, as I think it's called)? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I can't speak for zfs. I had upwards of 1000 snapshots on my system |
7 |
> before I stopped creating them hourly and and just started having |
8 |
> issues with it. |
9 |
|
10 |
Ok, it can handle my backup schedule then. :) |
11 |
|
12 |
> I wouldn't really say it is ready for prime time, but it is workable. |
13 |
> Of course, you'll still want backups - a million snapshots does you no |
14 |
> good if some bug wipes out your filesystem. For one of my ENOSPC |
15 |
> incidents I ended up just wiping the entire filesystem and restoring |
16 |
> from backup, though if I kept at it I'd probably have been able to fix |
17 |
> it. |
18 |
|
19 |
Agreed, this is why the backup system would be adjusted for BTRFS on the |
20 |
fileserver, when I get round to it. I would probably keep snapshots active for |
21 |
the past 2 weeks. |
22 |
|
23 |
> Oh, one other tip if you use btrfs - be sure you have a rescue disk |
24 |
> that supports it. Hint, the old Gentoo install CD I had lying around |
25 |
> didn't. You'll probably want to keep a rescue CD with a recent kernel |
26 |
> and btrfs-tools handy at all times. |
27 |
|
28 |
Always important. I just saw the other email which states that the latest |
29 |
sysresccd supports it. That is fine for me. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Joost |