1 |
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:10:45 -0600 |
2 |
»Q« <boxcars@×××.net> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:45:33 +0200 |
5 |
> Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> [about udev and CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y] |
8 |
> > A news item about this is coming down the wire very soon now (aka |
9 |
> > within hours judging by the thread on -dev). |
10 |
> |
11 |
> It's there now. Among other things, it mentions checking the /dev |
12 |
> entry in fstab, if there is one. I don't have one, but I'm curious. |
13 |
> Is it the udev-mount service in my default runlevel that makes it |
14 |
> unnecessary to have /dev in fstab? Also, what would be the reasons |
15 |
> for adding a /dev entry? |
16 |
|
17 |
yes it's udev-mount: |
18 |
|
19 |
if ! grep -qs devtmpfs /proc/filesystems; then |
20 |
eerror "CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y is required in your kernel |
21 |
configuration" eerror "for this version of udev to run |
22 |
successfully." eerror "This requires immediate attention." |
23 |
if ! mountinfo -q /dev; then |
24 |
mount -n -t tmpfs dev /dev |
25 |
busybox mdev -s |
26 |
mkdir /dev/pts |
27 |
fi |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
I don't see any good reason whatsoever to add /dev to fstab, unless you |
31 |
want to change the default mount options for some reason |
32 |
|
33 |
> |
34 |
> > Unfortunately, it's too late for you now but at least many other |
35 |
> > users will see the message before they emerge world and save them |
36 |
> > some pain |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Yeah. I use elogv to look at anything with warnings or errors after |
39 |
> an emerge, and I can't explain how I overlooked the bright red notice |
40 |
> this time. |
41 |
> |
42 |
> Normally, I follow this group and know what has come up for people |
43 |
> running ~arch (or if I don't *know*, I at least remember there's to |
44 |
> keep my eyes open for). But I've given up on following udev threads |
45 |
> here, which tend to get pretty noisy. |
46 |
> |
47 |
> Of course there's no substitute for paying attention, but it's nice to |
48 |
> get a news item, even nicer if it comes before things hit stable. |
49 |
|
50 |
:-) |
51 |
|
52 |
I seem to have lost my virtual consoles recently, courtesy of |
53 |
udev-197 :-( |
54 |
|
55 |
Haven't figured out why yet, I suppose I'll have to read all those |
56 |
noisy udev threads again |
57 |
|
58 |
|
59 |
|
60 |
|
61 |
-- |
62 |
Alan McKinnon |
63 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |