| 1 |
On 4/1/2010 4:38 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Joerg Schilling |
| 3 |
> <Joerg.Schilling@××××××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Your media was either accepted after several tries by the drive for unknown |
| 5 |
>> reasons and is now usable in general again or you are observing a problem |
| 6 |
>> caused by "hald". Note that hald does not care about the CD/DVD/BD Writing |
| 7 |
>> process and interrupts it. This is why hald may cause any strange result. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Would a HAL preprobe FDI like this prevent it from interfering with burning? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> |
| 12 |
> <deviceinfo version="0.2"> |
| 13 |
> <device> |
| 14 |
> <match key="storage.drive_type" string="cdrom"> |
| 15 |
> <merge key="info.ignore" type="bool">true</merge> |
| 16 |
> </match> |
| 17 |
> </device> |
| 18 |
> </deviceinfo> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Bad enough you mentioned HAL in a conversation with Dale. Now there's |
| 22 |
XML involved. This thread is officially never going to end. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
--Mike |
Archives