1 |
walt wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 15:49:16 -0500 |
3 |
> Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> I think there is two issues but you are addressing one of them it |
8 |
>> seems. The other issue happens when the kernel panics and it reboots |
9 |
>> itself. It doesn't complete the boot process. The one you describe |
10 |
>> could be it tho. On that one, I don't have a GUI. Since I use my |
11 |
>> puter a lot, I usually just reboot to a known working kernel and deal |
12 |
>> with it later. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> While I think I get the idea of what the kernel devs are doing. I |
15 |
>> also think they should let the users send the message. The users can |
16 |
>> start buying ATI or other video hardware and at some point, they will |
17 |
>> either get their ducks in a row or lose sales. In the meantime, the |
18 |
>> users decide what software they want to use. |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> I did some searching based on the config option you gave and I'm |
21 |
>> unable to find a way to override this myself. It doesn't seem to be |
22 |
>> a setting I can put in make.conf or package.use etc either. If this |
23 |
>> is the case, I may wish Nvidia would switch to open source but it |
24 |
>> sort of rubs me the wrong way that someone else is making the |
25 |
>> decision and me having no way to exercise my decision to use it |
26 |
>> anyway. I don't care if Nvidia doesn't show its code as long as it |
27 |
>> works and it isn't spying on me or blowing up my house here. |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> If you have any info on how to override this, I'd be glad to see it. |
30 |
>> Just a link or something would help. |
31 |
> This is a bug for ati-drivers, but nvidia-drivers has exactly the same |
32 |
> problem to solve. Comments 7, 8, 9 sum it up pretty well: |
33 |
> |
34 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=548118 |
35 |
> |
36 |
> |
37 |
|
38 |
I read through that long thing. It seems the kernel folks are stirring |
39 |
up a storm that makes the users have to jump through hoops. Let me see |
40 |
if I get this right. The kernel devs don't want to allow a user to |
41 |
install a driver that they don't approve of. Those would include Nvidia |
42 |
and ATI it would seem, at least. So, since they don't like the drivers, |
43 |
they make it so that users can't use them. Which leaves users with two |
44 |
options, three if you like to jump a lot. Option one, don't upgrade |
45 |
your kernel and use the older versions, lacking security fixes and all |
46 |
that goes with it. Option 2, do without a GUI since you don't have |
47 |
video driver for your video card. Option 3, force the drivers to build |
48 |
and maybe even violate the law while doing it. It seems based on one |
49 |
post that you can't just change that code so that it will load like it |
50 |
has before. Well, at least not easily. |
51 |
|
52 |
Here's a clue. Why doesn't the kernel devs let users decide what |
53 |
drivers they are comfy with using? If they don't like the drivers, then |
54 |
make it so that users have to install their own just like we have for |
55 |
ages but don't disable them or make them not load and work. The kernel |
56 |
devs can stop using the drivers they don't like and sit there in a |
57 |
console with no GUI while the rest of us go on with life and using our |
58 |
video drivers that we are happy with. |
59 |
|
60 |
Sounds to simple don't it? LOL |
61 |
|
62 |
Dale |
63 |
|
64 |
:-) :-) |