| 1 |
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 01:44:04AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 02 April 2015 21:30:14 Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > I recently upgraded a 7+ year old machine from 32-bit Gentoo to 64-bit- |
| 5 |
> > only Gentoo (no-multilib) and I don't have any apps with problems as 64- |
| 6 |
> > bit only. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Do you have Flash? If that runs on no-multilib I'd consider switching to |
| 9 |
> that profile. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Yes, flash works fine. Mind you, it hogs CPU on my over-7-year-old |
| 12 |
Core 2 duo, but the 32-bit version would also do that, too. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Don't know about VirtualBox though, which I use for WinXP from |
| 15 |
> time to time. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Bad news for Virtualbox... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
====================================================================== |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
[d531][waltdnes][~] emerge -pv virtualbox |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
These are the packages that would be merged, in order: |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Calculating dependencies... done! |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "virtualbox" have been masked. |
| 28 |
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: |
| 29 |
- app-emulation/virtualbox-9999::gentoo (masked by: package.mask, missing keyword) |
| 30 |
/usr/portage/profiles/features/64bit-native/package.mask: |
| 31 |
# AMD64 Team <amd64@g.o> |
| 32 |
# Mask packages that rely on amd64 multilib |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
====================================================================== |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
| 38 |
I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications |
Archives