From: | Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] portage 2.2 in ~amd64 | ||
Date: | Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:05:14 | ||
Message-Id: | 521DD947.10904@libertytrek.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] portage 2.2 in ~amd64 by gottlieb@nyu.edu |
1 | On 2013-08-27 5:27 PM, gottlieb@×××.edu <gottlieb@×××.edu> wrote: |
2 | > I was away for two weeks. I just resynced and see that 2.2.1 is now in |
3 | > testing (and my current version 2.1.13.1 is not in the tree). |
4 | > |
5 | > Am I correct in believing that when I upgrade to 2.2.1, all the commands |
6 | > from 2.1.x.y will continue to work? I know that several readers have |
7 | > used 2.2 for years with success. |
8 | |
9 | So... is 2.2 *ever* going to go stable??? |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] portage 2.2 in ~amd64 | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-user] portage 2.2 in ~amd64 | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
[gentoo-user] Re: portage 2.2 in ~amd64 | "»Q«" <boxcars@×××.net> |