| 1 |
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 16:51 +0000, Fernando Meira wrote: |
| 2 |
> Thank you all for answering :) |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I'm getting the feeling that I should go for e17 after what I've been |
| 5 |
> seeing and reading!!! (though a few guys returned back to e16 |
| 6 |
> afterwards). |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Luke, you been using it for 3 months and never used e16. So, would you |
| 9 |
> said that I should start my experience with enlightenment wm in its |
| 10 |
> newer version and skip the learning stage in its stable version? :) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I dont see any reason not to try e17. I also dont see any reason not to |
| 14 |
try e16 if you think it looks interesting as well. I think e17 is going |
| 15 |
to be, if its not already, better in just about every way than e16. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I don't think that emergeing e17 will overwrite e16, because the |
| 18 |
executable for e17 is called enlightenment-0.17, which probably was done |
| 19 |
intentionally so that "enlightenment" from e16 wouldnt be overwritten |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives