Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Holly Bostick <motub@××××××.nl>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Big problem with module-rebuild [SOLVED]
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:46:58
Message-Id: 436FA9E2.1080601@planet.nl
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Big problem with module-rebuild by Remy Blank
1 Remy Blank schreef:
2 > Holly Bostick wrote:
3 >
4 >> And the drivers build and install fine... then this:
5 >>
6 >> |>>> Safely unmerging already-installed instance... <snip> ==>---
7 >> cfgpro obj /lib/modules/2.6.13-gentoo-r4/video/fglrx.ko ==>---
8 >> cfgpro dir /lib/modules/2.6.13-gentoo-r4/video ==>--- cfgpro dir
9 >> /lib/modules/2.6.13-gentoo-r4 <snip> Switching to ati OpenGL
10 >> interface... done |>>> original instance of package unmerged
11 >> safely. Switching to ati OpenGL interface... done
12 >>
13 >> So the rebuild process has *removed* the kernel modules for what
14 >> will be the previous kernel when I reboot
15 >
16 >
17 > I don't think so. "cfgpro" means the modules are *not* removed on
18 > unmerge. Have a look, they should still be there. At least, they are
19 > on my machines, although I don't use module-rebuild but a custom
20 > script (a one-liner, actually). I have always had the messages as you
21 > describe above, and the modules have always stayed around. If they
22 > don't, then something is wrong with your configuration.
23 >
24 > It's kinda the same as /etc on unmerge. The files just stick around.
25 >
26 > -- Remy
27
28 Thank you, Remy-- you're right:
29
30 la /lib/modules/2.6.13-gentoo-r4/video/
31 totaal 317
32 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 72 nov 7 18:00 .
33 drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 496 nov 7 18:30 ..
34 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 321951 nov 7 18:00 fglrx.ko
35
36 OK, so I'm panicking over nothing, which is good to know, but now I'm a
37 little P.O.'d that I should have had *cause* to panic (I've gotta be a
38 bit P.O'd about something, since I've made a fool of myself ;-) ).
39
40 Seems to me that someone even less technically adept than I am (and I'm
41 not really all that, after all), could really lose their cool under
42 these circumstances, all because of that little cfgpro that they might
43 not know what it means, even if they saw it.
44
45 I'm really glad to know that the files are not in fact removed, but I
46 have this feeling that it should have been clearer that they really
47 weren't removed, despite the fact that that section of the operation was
48 removing files. Ah well, I know Portage isn't perfect, but it usually
49 doesn't scare the pants off me just during normal operation like that
50 (which tends to scare me more than just normal Portage scary-stuff).
51
52 Anyway, thanks again.
53
54 Holly
55 --
56 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list