1 |
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:10:30 -0500, Willie Wong <wwong@××××××××××××××.edu> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:32:20PM +0100, Penguin Lover Jes??s Guerrero |
4 |
> squawked: |
5 |
>> On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 13:22:38 +0200, Dirk Uys <dirkcuys@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
>> > This has been bothering me for some time now. I have a Dell PC at |
7 |
work, |
8 |
>> > Intel Core2 Duo with 4gb ram etc. Whenever something does a lot of |
9 |
disk |
10 |
>> > access, the PC slows down to a halt? |
11 |
> |
12 |
>> > The application that is mostly involved when I get |
13 |
>> > these long delays is FireFox, VMWare and emerge (emerge --sync). |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> I know I am hitting at the obvious, but I can't be sure you already |
16 |
>> checked that. |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> Since the applications you are using can be quite intensive in memory |
19 |
>> usage, did you check whether you are hitting swap or not? |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I realize that Firefox is a memory hog, but how many tabs must be open |
22 |
> for Swap to hit severely on a machine with 4gb ram? :) |
23 |
|
24 |
A lot. But even though it's possible to hog that system with firefox |
25 |
alone, I wasn't thinking in that extreme case. I was more thinking along |
26 |
the lines of wmware running a huge vm inside of it and I only meant firefox |
27 |
and emerge as little Satan's helpers :D |
28 |
|
29 |
> Question in general: emerge --sync and VMWare I can see, but why does |
30 |
> FireFox require heavy disk access? |
31 |
|
32 |
Well, that's why I ask if he's hitting swap. ANY app will require disk |
33 |
access, even if not directly, if the ram is full. I have no idea if that's |
34 |
the case though, I was just pointing at a possibility :) |
35 |
-- |
36 |
Jesús Guerrero |