1 |
Grant <emailgrant <at> gmail.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
> I've been using motion along with USB cameras for a while. I need to |
5 |
> expand my monitoring capacity and I'm wondering if I should consider |
6 |
> changing software or hardware. motion seems fairly dead but is |
7 |
> stable. I'm reading conflicting info about the current status of |
8 |
> zoneminder. Is anyone using IP cams? |
9 |
|
10 |
Hello Grant, |
11 |
|
12 |
I've not kept up with the last few years, but here is what I did |
13 |
before that. IP (h.264 over tcp/ip/udp) is a random matrix if which |
14 |
vendors cameras work with which vendors dvr. A dvr is a decoder box |
15 |
with a hard drive. You then connect your web browser to the DVR where |
16 |
the managerie of IP cams store the video. IT SUCKS for open source. |
17 |
|
18 |
Some vendors will give you binaries or have pre-compiled binaries |
19 |
(an API they call it) to load onto your Linux system (red hat or such), |
20 |
but those are often clunky and annoying, at best. The industry |
21 |
is still beholden to Microsoft and the MPLA.......... |
22 |
|
23 |
ZONEMINDER is a difficult read. It would not have been that difficult |
24 |
to add support for H.264 (Mpeg-HVC) but most of the folks that developed |
25 |
that deep knowledge headed for BIG PAYCHECKS and the proprietary |
26 |
buggy..... |
27 |
|
28 |
If you find some open source minded developers, willing to fork zoneminder, |
29 |
let me know and I'll contribute as I can.... I'm sorry the news is |
30 |
not better; in fact there could be another project out there that |
31 |
I'm not aware of, as I've been in other spaces for the last few years. |
32 |
|
33 |
The best contact I can give you is Andrey Filippov. He is a hardware |
34 |
designer that buids (use to?) an open source hardware camera that |
35 |
does amazing things. He will know software developers still active |
36 |
in the space and folks that may have an open source H.264 solution. |
37 |
|
38 |
http://wwww.elphel.com |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
Google has an open source video solution (can't recall the name, VP8?) that |
42 |
is suppose to be better than H.264 and open source, so search it out! |
43 |
|
44 |
http://gigaom.com/2013/10/30/google-sticks-with-vp8-opposes-ciscos-push-for-h-264/ |
45 |
|
46 |
http://www.webmproject.org/license/bitstream/ |
47 |
|
48 |
|
49 |
Regardless of which way you go, learn about MPLA, cause the SUE the shit |
50 |
out of grade school kids for touching video..... |
51 |
|
52 |
|
53 |
Do post back what you learn? |
54 |
|
55 |
hth, |
56 |
James |