| 1 |
Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2017, 19:44:33 CEST schrieb tuxic@××××××.de: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> what is the better choice: |
| 5 |
> This one: |
| 6 |
> * media-gfx/cura |
| 7 |
> Available versions: (~)0.15.04.4 (~)0.15.04.5_rc5 (~)2.1.0_beta |
| 8 |
> (~)2.3.1 (~)2.6.0 {+usb PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_4 python3_5 |
| 9 |
> python3_6" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4 python3_5 python3_6"} |
| 10 |
> Homepage: https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura |
| 11 |
> Description: A 3D model slicing application for 3D printing |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| 14 |
> or |
| 15 |
> This one: |
| 16 |
> * media-gfx/curaengine |
| 17 |
> Available versions: (~)0.15.04.6 (~)2.1.0_beta (~)2.3.1 (~)2.6.0 {doc |
| 18 |
> test} Homepage: https://github.com/Ultimaker/CuraEngine |
| 19 |
> Description: A 3D model slicing engine for 3D printing |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
^^^^^^ |
| 22 |
> Looks pretty identical to me...but I am no native speaker... ;) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
As I attempted to point out above, one is the engine and one is the |
| 25 |
application. I suspect that installing cura will pull in curaengine as a |
| 26 |
dependency (addendum: looking at the ebuild verified this). |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> Cheers |
| 29 |
> Meino |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
HTH |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Marc Joliet |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we |
| 36 |
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup |
Archives